Most Americans believe school teachers deserve substantial salary increases. Most Americans believe that success in school translates to success in life. Most Americans believe that schools should be drug-free, alcohol-free, tobacco-free, firearm-free, bully-free, asbestos-free, pedophile-free zones for learning. Most Americans (especially heavy-hitting intellectual divas like Whitney Houston) believe that children are our future.
But are most Americans willing to ask themselves the difficult (but deceptively simple) questions regarding education and public schools? A typical exchange with my fellow parents on a park bench, or in the tae kwon do lobby, or in the kids' section of the library, usually goes something like this:
(informed parent) "So, I hear you guys have excellent schools in northwest city."
(Stephen) "I'm not sure. What constitutes an excellent school, in your opinion?"
(informed parent) blank stare
(Stephen) "Perhaps I'm getting ahead of myself. What I meant to ask was what are schools for?"
(informed parent) flees in minivan to the closest Chick-fil-a
(Stephen) surreptitiously sniffs armpit
Although we may evade many of these fundamental questions, schooling and education continue to command headlines in the media and hot topics abound: the No Child Left Behind Act, the new Washington DC school czar, various book banning initiatives, school vouchers, privatization, Darwin (sigh--45% of Americans continue to believe in creationism), billions of dollars dedicated to schools/education in the Obama stimulus plan. To put ourselves in a position to weigh in on these important issues (and many others), we can begin by simply reflecting on our own (very distant) school experiences.
The late social critic (and former elementary school teacher) Neil Postman stated:
At its best, schooling can be about how to make a life, which is quite different from how to make a living. With such a purpose, schooling becomes the central institution through which the young may find reasons for continuing to educate themselves.
My experience in public school was a disheartening one (I failed to learn how to make a life or a living). High school was particularly bad since the 1000+ students were "detained" in an architectural nightmare resembling Bentham's Panopticon. Let's see what's going on inside, shall we?
My 10th grade English teacher/automaton stomps methodically through Edith Hamilton's Mythology, pausing occasionally to coldly dismantle an unorthodox notebook. Another teacher accuses me of plagiarizing a research paper on replacement players during an NFL strike (because it reads so well). An assistant principal measures the flesh between the top of my kneecap and the edge of my shorts with a wooden ruler and sends me immediately to ISS. I watch three solid hours of Iraq war coverage on CNN in drafting class. I am banished from the library for quietly discussing a novel with a friend. I haul my entire John Bonham-replica drum kit into speech class for a disruptive "how to" speech. I listen to a history teacher complain about his hemorrhoids and wonder if he's referring to me and my classmates. I watch a sophomore nearly choke to death on a piece of celery.
It was clear to me that the great majority of my teachers were less than enthusiastic about coming to work, and I certainly did not want to be there (I've created a name for this phenomenon--mutually assured rejection). I was not invited to register for any advanced coursework, and the only reason I took the SAT (which I knew absolutely nothing about) was because of the baseball recruitment letters I was receiving from various colleges and universities. I remember the bewilderment of my elderly guidance counselor when she saw my SAT score ("You can actually go to college with this score!")
The one highlight for me was reading Mary Shelly's Frankenstein because it made me feel less lonely (monster secretly watches "normals" going about their lives, wishing he could be a part of it). In this same class, my teacher allowed me to choose a novel (I turned to Dickens) and be as creative with the "book report" as I dared. I constructed a newspaper with various "columns" and quirky headlines discussing the characters' plights, and it was well received.
Despite the mostly disappointing experience of public schooling, I developed an almost immediate passion for educating myself by building a broader and more sophisticated reading list (or self-willed literacy, as Fred Kaplan calls it) once I hit the university campus. This new found joy for learning was probably due to 1) escaping my home life, and 2) escaping my school life.
These days I'm observing my own kids' schooling with mixed feelings. The textbooks are DOA, many of the teachers seem frustrated and burdened (and sometimes outright hostile), administrators are increasingly playing politics with school boards, PTA's are consumed with fundraising and jockeying for highly prized leadership positions, educational researchers are testing theories that often seem out of touch with reality, and the students are slowly losing their joy and enthusiasm for learning, worrying over report cards, end-of-year testing, and the impending bully confrontation.
So...back to the uncomfortable questions we began with. What constitutes an excellent school? What are schools for? A brief blog posting will not suffice, and I'm not sure that I really know anyway (perhaps I'm the one that fled to Chick-fil-a). Perhaps all we can ask for is a safe place for our children to be engaged by an enthusiastic (and caring) faculty/staff that is committed to the notion of learning for its own sake (maybe throw in an experiential component) and, as Postman suggests, "the cultivation of a skeptical outlook based on reason." Some people call this critical thinking.
What I find most depressing is that many college and university students now resemble the lifeless masses I described in my previous recollections. Most view education merely as a credentialing process, an anti-intellectual gateway to the American middle class. In this scenario (described with chilling accuracy in the PBS documentary Declining By Degrees) students are not seeking education as a life changing experience (which implies growth). Instead, they are treading water. Meanwhile, the university machine becomes increasingly more business-like (as does the faculty reward structure) with external funding, student credit hours, and customer satisfaction surveys taking precedent over scholarship, mentorship, and curriculum issues.
I suppose if all else fails, my kids and I will cozy-up in some remote nook of the public library, deep in the stacks, reading and whispering until closing time.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think you have hit the nail on the head here. The topic *is* too big to be addressed in a blog posting, but you've definitely asked the right question: what are schools/schooling for?
ReplyDeleteI think most people (even parents) are stunningly unreflective about this question. Postman is definitely writing with Dewey in mind: "Education is not preparation for life. Education is life itself." To me, an important truth about schooling, though, is that schools are very conservtive institutions at the meta-level. Individual teachers and principals have good intentions and work hard to help students, but necessarily within tremendous constraints. Schools exist, in part, to perpetuate the existing norms and culture of a group, including its classist and racist structures, unfortunately. The way students are tracked and the way schools are often funded (see Kozol) are good examples of this. (The tracking is a sad legacy of the eugenics movement in our country--but you wouldn't hear many AG students/parents talking about that.) I also think that when people talk about what a "good school" is, they tend to pack a lot of classist and racist assumptions into it, whether or not they mean to.
There are some good aspects to NCLB, but the net effect has been to a) make money for testing companies and b)beat up schools with sizeable at-risk populations, since the big "stick" of NCLB is to take away Title I funding, which rich suburban schools don't rely on, but poor schools do. There are no carrots, functionally speaking.
The very troublesome metaphor of schools as business is something that I wish more people would be cautious about. If schools are businesses, and parents are consumers, what are students? Widgets? Schools and universities are far far too focused on making sure that they meet official criteria, and far too little is said about what those criteria are, and whether they are the appropriate ones. At the K-12 level, the obsession with AYP is paralleled at the university level by an obsession with enrollment figures and accreditation. There's no doubt that schools and universities can and should do more. Freire talks (and I agree) about the need for critical education--to rexamine all the features of our institutions, starting with the power dynamics in schools, but also how well schools empower students to transform their society through democratic participation.
I had to laugh at your description of high school, btw. I had to laugh or cry--so I decided to laugh....
and, can a comment get any longer? :^p
ReplyDeleteYou make several excellent points here. The test prep industry really worries me. There was an outstanding (and rather depressing) piece in the Sept 2008 issue of Harpers by a former Kaplan coach contracting with public schools in NYC. (http://www.harpers.org/archive/2008/09/0082166)
ReplyDeleteIf you have time, I would really like to share some of my formal ideas for after school critical thinking programs (resembling the Kettering Foundation's issue framing exercises with adults). Rather than utilize after school recreation programs for homework completion or Wii playing, I'd like to see a critical, civic foundation formed through fundamental conversation and debate activities. I remember Sandra Day O'Connor doing something with political problem solving video games for the youth and Nader alsoleading a similar initiative for Baby Boomers. If you are familiar with any relevant specialized literature on this topic, let me know.
The problem with emphasizing critical thinking skills, as Postman pointed out, is that it is often perceived as subversive and dangerous. Every educator I know pays lip service to critical thinking skills, and yet they abandon them at the first sight of controversy or inconvenience (just as I was saying in an earlier post...democracy is great until the shit hits the fan and then we place tremendous power in only a few priveledged--and inaccessible--hands. The masses cannot be trusted.)
I don't think that I've heard much about the kinds of programs that you're thinking about, but I bet people in Social Studies Ed would know more about it--I'll have to ask my friends. One of the sad things about NCLB is that there's a pile of money set aside for remediation/tutoring, but the $ is supposed to only be used to help kids pass their EOGs, which only deal with a very narrow set of skills. However, there are probably federal and/or private grants available to do the kinds of programs that you're thinking about...it would just take a willing administrator to kick it off (and a good grant writer, of course!)
ReplyDelete